Featured on the GIDG Podcast
I am honored to be featured in June 7, 2010 episode of the The Get-it-done Guy podcast, Stever Robbins’ popular productivity podcast (Stever is also the author of The Get-it-Done Guy’s 9 Steps to Work Less and Do More, an excellent resource for being more effective in both your professional and personal life). I was tempted to send him a thesis on the subject, for in respect of his time and the patience of his audience, we narrowed things down to the following topics:
- Why the classroom is a less than ideal place to learn.
- The importance of short, frequent exposure to the language.
- Using reading to back up your listening activities.
- Using spaced repetition to maximize retention.
| Read and Listen to the Episode |
A Note About Affiliate Income
I receive a small commission on purchases made through Amazon links and other affiliates, a little pile of pennies I use to feed my caffeine habit and pay for hosting fees. You don't pay more than you would otherwise, so why not support the blog and my need for sweet coffee goodness?Comment Rules
Comment, agree, disagree, argue, and throw in your two cents as you like, but please help make this a better world by following these comment rules:- Speak your mind but do so respectfully. Rude, offensive, disparaging comments will be deleted. I maintain the right to block the IP addresses of trolling jerk faces.
- I have a zero spam policy: if your comment is not directly related to the topic of the article or links to a site with no relation to language learning, it will be deleted immediately.
- And speaking of spammination, please use your actual name, not a business or blog name; the latter comes across as sleazy self-promotion, not a genuine attempt to join the conversation.
- Please do not post self-promotional links in the comments. If you have a language product you think I should review or want me to include your blog in my suggested sites, send it to me via email first so I can vet them.
I believe what especially matters in effective teaching and learning
English grammar is how clearly and easily understandable all grammar
rules are explained and whether adequate supportive exercises with real
life content are practised to master that material. It would take
foreign learners much less time to learn grammar rules that are
explained to learners than to figure out grammar rules on their own
based on even numerous examples because grammar rules may have
exceptions and other peculiarities.
Grammar books with explanations and exercises have been published by
knowledgeable language specialists to make learning grammar easier so
that learners don’t have to discover grammar rules anew the hard long
way.
I’ve received some messages from people advocating unconventional
English learning methods and promoting English learning products of that
kind. I’ve explored some of their websites that contain a number of
learners’ comments. Supporters of unconventional learning methods and
products claim that learning grammar is unnecessary and inhibits fluent
speaking.
A growing number of learners are misled and lose time experiencing delay
in language learning progress because of superficial claims of
promoters of unconventional English learning methods and products.
I disagree with those speculative claims as knowing grammar rules
logically reduces making mistakes by learners. Without adequate knowledge of English grammar rules learners often cannot create their own grammatically correct sentences, and often cannot understand what they read or listen to in English exactly.
Conventional communicative
English teaching and learning supported with adequate regular long-term
practice in listening comprehension and speaking English yield effective
results. Lack of such practice in English by learners produces speculations that
conventional English learning and teaching methods don’t work.
A quick question for you: have you learned a foreign language to fluency yourself? I have encountered a lot of EFL teachers who make claims about how to best learn a language but have never done so themselves.
Your comment that “without adequate knowledge of English grammar rules, learners often cannot create their own grammatically correct sentences, and often cannot understand what they read or listen to in English” completely ignores how the brain works. The human brain is hard wired to figure out the grammatical patterns in the language (or languages) it encounters if given enough input. You did not learn your native language of English through conscious study of English grammar, and nor is such study necessary for learning a foreign language. That said, I do think that adult learners can get some benefit from looking at the basic structures of their target language, but grammar rules are of little use until one has received enough exposure to the language.
Followers of
the natural immersion method of learning languages claim that pre-school children learn to speak their mother
tongue through constant listening to their native
speech and speaking practice, without learning grammar rules and without
practising grammar exercises. By that logic a foreign language can be
learned even by adults effectively the same way as a mother tongue by
little kids. I do not share that view because there are substantial
differences between learning a foreign language and native language
acquisition, and between kids’ and adults’ learning processes. It’s
worth noting that little kids learning to speak their mother tongue are
exposed to hearing only their native speech constantly every day and do
not hear any foreign language. Therefore there is no foreign language
interference as they develop thinking in their mother tongue only.
It takes them several years even under ideal conditions to speak their
native everyday language fluently although their advanced grammar and
vocabulary knowledge may be limited.
At secondary school students still have to learn the grammar of their native language to master it proficiently especially for academic and professional purposes.
Learning a foreign language, especially by adults is a different matter than acquiring a native language by little kids. Everyday listening and speaking in a foreign language
by adults living in their native countries are quite limited at best and often absent for some periods of
time, and they think in their native language they already know well, and there is a native
language interference in learning a foreign language (in terms of
pronunciation, grammar and vocabulary). A person can think only in the language that a person knows best and not in the language that a person knows little.
I believe without knowledge of grammar rules and adequate grammar
practice in exercises with communicative content it is impossible to
speak, understand and write in a foreign language correctly. Therefore
learning a foreign language must include adequate grammar learning as
well.
“Followers of the natural immersion method of learning languages claim that pre-school children learn to speak their mother tongue through constant listening to their native speech and speaking practice, without learning grammar rules and without practising grammar exercises.”
Look at the science; this is in fact exactly what happens. The belief that conscious study of grammar is needed even for native speakers is simply ridiculous. If this were the case, how do you account for humans learning languages prior to the advent of schools, teachers, and formal curricula? Early humans certainly learned one (or arguably many) languages to fluency without modern academic learning.
“At secondary school students still have to learn the grammar of their native language to master it proficiently especially for academic and professional purposes.”
It’s true, native speakers continue to hone their language skills throughout life, but what you are referring to is developing one’s style and acquiring additional specialized vocabulary, not a native speaker’s ability to understand and use the syntax of the language (“barring situations of medical abnormality or extreme privation, all the children in a given speech-community converge on very much the same grammar by the age of about five years.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_acquisition)
“Learning a foreign language, especially by adults is a different matter than acquiring a native language by little kids.”
Yes, there are differences between child and adult language acquisition (especially in terms of the oh-so important affective factors), but the fundamentals are the same: we both acquire languages through meaningful input and active output.
Everyday listening and speaking in a foreign language by adults living in their native countries are quite limited at best and often absent for some periods of time”
The modern language learner has unprecedented access to foreign language input and opportunities to practice output no matter where in the world they live. Many adult learners are simply unaware of what’s available, are unmotivated to use the readily available resources, or carry the same misconceptions you are promoting: that language learning should (or can only) happen in formal settings with a teacher and textbook.
“A person can think only in the language that a person knows best and not in the language that a person knows little.”
Of course you cannot think in a language you don’t yet have sufficient exposure to. But the more time you spend listening to and speaking a language, the easier it becomes to think in that language. The key is to create a direct, subconscious link between “mentalese” (the actual language of the brain) and the arbitrary sounds of a given language; too much conscious study of a language (as you promote) just creates more steps, more interference.
“I believe without knowledge of grammar rules and adequate grammar practice in exercises with communicative content it is impossible to speak, understand and write in a foreign language correctly. Therefore learning a foreign language must include adequate grammar learning as well.”
Not to be harsh, but have you actually learned a foreign language to fluency using the methods you propose? I know many English teachers who espouse similar beliefs without ever practicing what they preach.